The port to be used for polling over HTTP. The public address used for serving polling requests. If specified, it will use a different interface for polling requests. See SSL configuration for more details.īy default, the Collaborator will use the same network interface for capturing interaction events and serving polling requests. Used to generate a self-signed certificate. This should only be changed from the default if port 465 is being forwarded. The ports for listening for SMTPS interaction events. This should only be changed from the default if ports 25 and 587 are being forwarded. The ports for listening for SMTP interaction events. This should only be changed from the default if port 443 is being forwarded. The ports for listening for HTTPS interaction events. This should only be changed from the default if port 80 is being forwarded. The ports for listening for HTTP interaction events. The public IP address used for capturing interaction events. If specified, it will only listen on the configured interfaces. The number of threads used by the Collaborator to process incoming requests.īy default, the Collaborator will listen on all local interfaces for capturing interaction events. This setting is required for DNS functionality. The domain or subdomain which the Collaborator server will control DNS for. This compromises the functionings and being of the people.The definitions of the supported fields in the configuration file are shown below: serverDomain The application of the principle-based ethics in the healthcare delivery system and in other endeavors of Sub-Saharan Africa is achieved through the paternalism of superior powers. Hohfeldian rights relate to Sub-Sahara Africa as universal man and amalgamate with African ethics and morality through the paternalism of doctors, community leaders and other “decision experts” in society in general. Principle-based ethics does not incorporate African ethics per se, although physicians’, and decision experts’ paternalism enhances the health-seeking behavior of Africa’s people, it interferes with their “rights”, “claims”, “power” and “privilege”, as well as their capabilities and functionings. This shows that Hohfeldian rights are a natural part of African ethics. Hand searching of selected printed journals and grey literature such as technical reports and conference proceedings were also accessed and briefed for further analyses. Whether ethical concepts of “responsibility” and “paternalism” should be more promoted and if so, what happens to their “functionings” and “being”? The author examined the literature on ethics, searched databases for reports and published papers in the English language. Whether the Hohfeldian incidents should be applied to Sub-Saharan Africa in measuring the degree of autonomy, capacity and informed consent, given the limited actual and medical education. In this regard, periodic review of how principle-based ethics is being integrated into the health-seeking behavior of Sub-Saharan Africa is essential to the capabilities and functionings of the people. Hohfeldian Incidents, Principle-Based Ethics, Capability, Functionings, African Traditional Ethics, Sub-Saharan AfricaĪBSTRACT: Principle-based ethics appears to be recent addition to Sub-Saharan Africa’s rights profile, although universal principles of morality have been part of the region from time immemorial. Juxtaposition of Hohfeldian Rights, Principle-Based Ethics, Functionings, and the Health-Seeking Behavior of Sub-Saharan AfricaĪUTHORS: Ishmael D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |